Behind the Score: Salomon and Haydn
/JOHANN SALOMON - Thomas Hardy
Johann Salomon became a dear friend and close colleague of Haydn. Today, he is most famously remembered for bringing the composer to London in both 1791 and 1794. This was deemed at the time to be such an exciting event that it was announced proudly in The Morning Chronicle to the general public on December 29th, 1790:
TITLE PAGE OF FIRST PUBLISHED EDITION OF ONE OF SALOMON’S ARRANGEMENTS
Mr. Salomon, having taken a journey to Vienna purposely to engage the celebrated Haydn, Chapel-Master to his present Highness Prince Esterhazy, to come to England, most respectfully acquaints the Nobility and the Gentry that he has actually signed an agreement with Mr. Haydn. (They) hope to be in London before the end of December, when Mr. Salomon will have the honour of submitting to the Publick a Plan of a Subscription Concert, which he flatters himself will meet with its Approbation and Encouragement.
Salomon was a German violinist, composer, and impresario in his own right. He was born in Bonn around 1745 and began working in the court orchestra at just thirteen years of age. Clearly a precocious talent, he became the concertmaster there before he was even twenty.
He moved to London in the 1780s where he became well known as a concertmaster, soloist, composer and chamber musician. As a concertmaster, he led many of the premieres of Haydn’s works in London, and Haydn’s London Symphonies are sometimes even referred to as the Salomon Symphonies.
Interestingly, Salomon was one of only a few whom Haydn permitted to arrange his works. The title page of the first edition of his arrangements of the London Symphonies states that the works were “Composed for Mr. Salomon’s concerts and arranged for five instruments,” - two violins, a German flute, a tenor (viola) flute and violoncello with the accompaniment of an ad libitum keyboard. It is unclear whether Haydn played any role in this particular instrumentation.
In examining the treatment of Haydn’s music within the arrangements, it is clear that Salomon possessed a deep understanding of Haydn’s musical genius and remained faithful to it. He never sought to overshadow the music with any sense of his own spirit and at all times the music remains as close as possible to Haydn’s original. Salomon’s decision to pair the flute with strings manages to capture the energy of a much fuller orchestra and, at times, even gives that illusion.
In the eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries, chamber arrangements of larger-scale works were common. It was a popular way for composers to promote their works as well as to make money through purchases by amateur musicians to perform them with friends. Another reason was so that people could hear the works again or for the first time, often in their own home. Today this could be compared to listening to a recording or sharing a playlist on Spotify.
Rehearsal Gallery - Midori & Mozart
/Some lovely photos taken by Oliver Miller of our rehearsals with Midori Seiler
Read MoreHaydn's String Quartets and Nature
/ARTISTIC DIRECTOR - SKYE MCINTOSH - TALKS A LITTLE ABOUT WHAT IT IS LIKE TO PERFORM A WHOLE PROGRAM OF HAYDN STRING QUARTETS ON THE THEME OF NATURE
Read MoreOn Stage Gallery
/Some lovely photos taken by Oliver Miller of AHE onstage for our Haydn’s Farewell program
Read MoreRehearsal Gallery
/The orchestra in rehearsals for Haydn’s Farewell with guest director Erin Helyard.
Read MoreA view From the Bassoon
/We asked bassoonist Simon Rickard a few questions about our upcoming program, his role as bassoonist and what really went on in eighteenth century orchestras.
Question: Haydn is well known for his ability to include humour with drama and beauty. The Farewell Symphony is one of his most famous pieces. How does he achieve this in that Symphony, and what makes it such a well known work?
Simon: Haydn’s quicksilver wit and effortless elegance are nowhere more evident than in this famous symphony, which earned the nickname ‘Farewell Symphony’ (Abschiedssinfonie) from the deliberately anticlimactic ending Haydn wrote for it.
It is easy to forget that in Haydn’s day musicians were no more than glorified servants. Haydn’s patron, Prince Nikolaus Esterházy, maintained a small orchestra of musician-servants who accompanied him to his summer palace each year for his private entertainment. One year, the stay at the summer palace was very long, and the musicians, wanting to return home to their own families, appealed to Haydn to intercede with the prince on their behalf.
Ever ingenious and creative, Haydn composed this symphony as a message to the prince. At the end of the last movement, each musician snuffed out the candles on his music stand and left the stage one by one, until only a single violinist was left on stage to finish the symphony. This subtle hint must have worked, because the next morning the prince moved his court back to Eisenstadt, and the musicians were returned to their families.
Question: The bassoon doesn’t always have an independent part in this program, yet it is playing most of the time. What role did it have in the eighteenth century?
Simon: The bassoon was the workhorse of the eighteenth century bass section. As such, most eighteenth century orchestras had more bassoons than cellos or double basses. For example, the famous orchestra at the Dresden court, under Hasse in 1768, had five bassoons but only three cellos and three double basses. The orchestra at the theatre of Versailles in 1773 had six bassoons, with only five cellos and four double basses.
Haydn’s early orchestras had two bassoons but only one cello and one bass. However, by the end of his career, the role of the bassoon had changed from being part of the tutti bass section, to become a solo tenor voice. The classical orchestra became standardised at this time, with only two or three bassoons, each playing their own independent part, outnumbered by a greater number of cellos and basses.
Question: J.C. Bach’s symphony is very dramatic and, like Haydn’s Farewell, could be termed a Sturm und Drang work. What does that mean and what should audiences expect?
Simon: Sturm und Drang was a proto-romantic movement in the second half of the eighteenth century that expressed itself in both literature and music. The term is usually translated from German as ‘Storm and Stress’. However the word ‘Drang’ also suggests an urge, yearning or drive. This sums up the nature of this turbulent style perfectly. Full of driving rhythmic energy in the fast movements and languishing affectation in the slow ones, unexpected harmonic progressions and abrupt dynamic changes, this style always keeps the listener on the edge of their seat.
Sturm und Drang is one of my favourite musical movements. I find it absolutely thrilling hearing its exponents, such as CPE and JC Bach, Haydn and even the young Mozart, trying to express romantic concepts using essentially baroque musical language. If only this unique musical movement had lasted longer!
In Conversation with arranger Vi King Lim
/Arranging symphonic works from the classical era for chamber ensemble in the style of the eighteenth-century
Read MoreA View From the Flute
/"From the age of 7 until around 10 years I would head out every Saturday to music classes at a local Saturday Music School. My first lessons were as part of a class of 20 or so squawking descant recorders.”
Read More













